Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Harper, CFA, FRM's avatar

This year Google introduced its first-ever dividend (I have a position in GOOG) which is interesting. One the one hand, to Sherry's point, some investors consider this a signal and transition from growth to value. When they announced the dividend earlier this year, I noticed some SA writers refer to classical theory that new dividends suggest a company has fewer re-investment possibilities and must be maturing, especially in combination with share buybacks (I myself don't necessarily agree with this in GOOG's case but it's a not uncommon view). On the other hand, the mere introduction of any dividend creates new demand because many funds/ETF require some dividends; I view this as increasing the quality of the stock (I'd love to know how many funds add GOOG this year due to its new dividend, and what sort of dividend "bid" support is thusly created).

Against the 10*10 criteria, I'd have to agree on trimming almost entirely based on size alone: Google is a $2.0 trillion market cap company with >$70 BB in revenues, with all the attached regulatory scrutiny. It's not my idea of a 10-bagger today, but it's low-risk and high quality.

Expand full comment
Kahani Teller's avatar

Over a 5 year period, Google stock returned 166% returns compared to SPY at 93%. I feel your analysis is misleading and knowing that people respect your opinion, you might want to add the right caveats so people can make a better informed decision.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts